Sexual Violence in History: A Bibliography

compiled by Stefan Blaschke

Contact

+ Contact Form


Search

+ Search Form


Introduction

+ Aims & Scope

+ Structure

+ History


Announcements

+ Updates

+ Calls for Papers

+ New Lectures

+ New Publications


Alphabetical Index

+ Author Index

+ Speaker Index


Chronological Index

+ Ancient History

+ Medieval History

+ Modern History


Geographical Index

+ African History

+ American History

+ Asian History

+ European History

+ Oceanian History


Topical Index

+ Prosecution

+ Cases

+ Types

+ Offenders

+ Victims

+ Society

+ Research

+ Representations


Resources

+ Institutions

+ Literature Search

+ Research

Start: Alphabetical Index: Speaker Index: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

First published: March 7, 2020 - Last updated: August 1, 2024

TITLE INFORMATION

Speaker: ChaeRan Y. Freeze

Title: Epistemic Injustice in Jewish Rape and Seduction Court Cases in Tsarist Russia

Subtitle: -

Conference: 51st Annual Conference of the Annual Conference of the Association for Jewish Studies (December 15-17, 2019) - Online Program

Session: Listening for #MeToo in the Archives (Chair: Karla Goldman)

Place: San Diego, California, United States

Date: December 16, 2019

Language: English

Keywords: Modern History: 19th Century | European History: Russian History | Prosecution: Trials; Types: Rape



FULL TEXT

Link: -



ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Speaker: ChaeRan Freeze, Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies, Brandeis University - ResearchGate

Abstract: »This paper explores the epistemic injustices that Jewish women suffered in Russian state courts in rape and seduction cases owing to a “credibility deficit” that resulted from legal definitions of sexual violation and social perceptions of “wayward” women. Russian laws defined seduction (obol’shchnie) as the “luring of a single, honorable woman into a mutual [sexual] relationship with a solemn promise to marry her.” In these cases, the plaintiff not only had to prove that her lover expressed a serious intention of marriage but that she was honorable. By definition, Jewish women who engaged in premarital sex in traditional Jewish society were not viewed as models of modesty and virtue. In Russian law, rape (iznasilovanie) was defined as a serious crime, but women rarely received justice in these cases; even the slightest hint of impropriety made a woman an accomplice in the act. This paper will examine why women were not believed (testimonial injustice) as the court scrutinized their reputations, behaviors, and sexual status (based on invasive gynecological examinations), while it rarely subjected men to such treatment, especially the intense surveillance over their bodies.« (Source: Online Program)

Wikipedia: History of Europe: History of Russia / Russian Empire | Sex and the law: Rape / Rape in Russia